Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!news2.euro.net!newshub1.home.nl!home.nl!not-for-mail
From: Frank <fvanbortel@netscape.net>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: optimizer parameters
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:38:41 +0200
Organization: @Home Benelux
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <bm65am$ptj$1@news1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl>
References: <3F82E81E.98A92384@wholefoods.com> <R_Ggb.64122$2E4.3125361@phobos.telenet-ops.be> <O8Tgb.141633$bo1.37865@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <xY%gb.66805$dm5.3410975@phobos.telenet-ops.be>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cc28855-a.hnglo1.ov.home.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl 1065785494 26547 217.121.193.81 (10 Oct 2003 11:31:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 11:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <xY%gb.66805$dm5.3410975@phobos.telenet-ops.be>
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:244989

Luc Gyselinck wrote:

> I know about this paper.
> 
> Indeed, the optimizer_index_caching parameter can be calculated by looking
> at the ratio of the logical and physical reads. But these counters are
> totals of data AND index blocks. But we need the counters for the index
> blocks ONLY (to be more accurate).
> 
> Another thing is that in a DEVELOPMENT environment, these counters do not
> reflect the PRODUCTION environment. Many developers run 'test' (and most of
> the time 'bad') SQL that will make the results of these counters more or
> less useless. Maybe you should measure this ratio in the production
> environment, calculate the value of the parameter and copy it over to the
> development environment and do your tuning?
> 
That's called the acceptance stage...

> I will re-read the paper if have my other computer switched on (this one has
> no MSWORD installed).
> 
> Thanks for the reaction.
> 
> "Richard Foote" <richard.foote@bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:O8Tgb.141633$bo1.37865@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> 
<snip!>

>>Hi Luc,
>>
>>If I may, I would recommend the paper "The Search For Intelligent Life In
>>The CBO" by Tim Gorman at www.evdbt.com as an excellent introduction on
> 
> how
> 
>>to possibly tune these parameters. It provides some sensible techniques on
>>how to determine appropriate values rather than the broad generalisations
>>(which may or may not be suitable) offered by others in this thread.
>>
>>Good Luck
>>
>>Richard
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

Read it with great interest
-- 
Regards, Frank van Bortel

