Re: Oracle's Myth: keep tables and indexes in separate tablespaces

From: Jack <nn_at_mail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 14:54:55 GMT
Message-ID: <3Fehb.231$hV6.155@read3.inet.fi>

Look:
http://otn.oracle.com/deploy/performance/pdf/opt_storage_conf.pdf

You might have a look at Juan Loaiza's article "Optimal Storage Configuration Made Easy" http://technet.oracle.com/deploy/performance/ for a different approach to the problem. Since this is on technet, it appears to be Oracle's latest recommendation.

"Howard J. Rogers" <hjr_at_dizwell.com> wrote in message news:3f857214$0$28118$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> Jack wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually Oracle recommends S.A.M.E and raid-10, and
> > they "would like to make it the ONLY configuration for Oracle".
> >
> > Update your data.
> >
>
> Er, no they don't. When was the last performance tuning course you went
on?
> Or the last DBA Fundamentals course (where they still teach OFA)? The
> recommendation the poster spoke about is still there in both of them. As
of
> last week.
>
> Regards
> HJR
> --
> --------------------------------------------
> See my brand new website, soon to be full of
> new articles: www.dizwell.com.
> Nothing much there yet, but give it time!!
> --------------------------------------------
>
Received on Thu Oct 09 2003 - 09:54:55 CDT