Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: ARCHIVE and NO ARCHIVE ?!?!?!?

Re: ARCHIVE and NO ARCHIVE ?!?!?!?

From: Turkbear <john.greco_at_dot.state.mn.us>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:53:26 -0500
Message-ID: <2opgmv0v3fhgd4svs19fo6i5fgit25vapg@4ax.com>


"Richard Foote" <richard.foote_at_bigpond.com> wrote:

>
>"Ruthf" <ruthf_at_tvuna.co.il> wrote in message
>news:48580dac.0309170324.49e65049_at_posting.google.com...
>> We changed our server from ARCHIVE to NO ARCHIVE mode.
>> WHY DO I GET THE FOLLOWING ERROR ???????????
>>
>> Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 2107
>> All online logs needed archiving
>> Current log# 1 seq# 2106 mem# 0: E:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORC1\REDO01_N.LOG
>> Current log# 1 seq# 2106 mem# 1: H:\ORACLE\ORADATA\REDO01_2.LOG
>
>Hi Ruthf,
>
>Having placed your database in archivelog mode, Oracle will not overwrite a
>redo log group unless it has been appropriately archived. In the above case,
>none of your redo logs have been archived to Oracle's satisfaction.
>
>My guess is that you haven't started the ARCH process (via the
>log_archive_start parameter) hence you're database sitting like a stunned
>mullet. That said, if you're unable to archive any of your mandatory
>destinations or you're unable to satisfy the log_archive_min_succeed_dest
>parameter, you could be likewise stuffed.
>
>Still reckon you haven't started the archive process though ...
>
>Good Luck
>
>Richard
>

The OP indicated that they have changed to NOARCHIVELOG mode..I suspect that they did not STOP the ARCH process..Or 'bounce' the instance. Received on Wed Sep 17 2003 - 08:53:26 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US