Re: Temporary tables in memory

From: Chris Jack <chris_jack_at_msn.com>
Date: 3 Sep 2003 08:38:38 -0700
Message-ID: <648c9f62.0309030738.45743654@posting.google.com>

"Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_no_spam.comcast.net> wrote in message news:<Jlb5b.254239$cF.79644_at_rwcrnsc53>...
> I thought in an earlier post you said that this was an application from a
> vendor and you don't have control over it. Thus it becomes a vendor
> problem. You should contact the vendor and find out how they are going to
> fix it. Clearly, they did a straight port and that is just plain moronic.
> One should take full advantage of whatever tool you buy. Put pressure on
> the vendor.
> Jim

This _is_ a vendor application - I have to deal with the implementation of it. The problem is substantially (but not completely) fixed in the next version, but that is not a solution, for the 2 clients where I am implementing it, for at least a year.

The vendor is aware of the problem, but cannot practically do anything to fix the current version.

Regards
Chris Received on Wed Sep 03 2003 - 10:38:38 CDT