Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!nntp.abs.net!news.algonet.se!algonet!HSNX.atgi.net!mozo.cc.purdue.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsbin.cistron.nl!not-for-mail
From: Jared of Europa <jared@intnospamvelt.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Fine-grained Access Control and constraint violations
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 22:26:34 +0200
Organization: Cistron Netherlands
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <sb18jvslo7k38b39avemlg0nsd5r080q7k@4ax.com>
References: <945a3a61.0308080346.67708a83@posting.google.com> <3F33C69A.11BC8EEE@exxesolutions.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: cust.93.22.adsl.cistron.nl
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: enterprise.cistron.net 1060374393 616 195.64.93.22 (8 Aug 2003 20:26:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:26:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:240266

In this foul year of our lord Fri, 08 Aug 2003 08:49:46 -0700, Daniel
Morgan <damorgan@exxesolutions.com> proclaimed:

>From my read of your posting you have thrown out all of the rules of
>relational database theory taught in lesson one on databases.

I must have been off sick when they taught lesson one   :-)  

But seriously, which rules are violated here?  Lesson one on coaching
is that you tell a pupil *why* he's wrong, not just *that* he's wrong.

Keep in mind that the requirement for a constraint on unique names is
something that may change into a different constraint, or disappear,
on some future date.

>If you want this to work you will need to trash your design and go back to
>doing things the way they were intended to be done in a relational
>database. I'd start with reading Cobb.

I would redesign if I could, but we're working on an existing,
elaborate design.  The client asks for security on the existing
system, and telling him we'll need an extra 2 man-years for this job
would not make him very happy.
-*-
Ronald In 't Velt
