Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!prodigy.com!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: Sybrand Bakker Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: Can this Sun doc be trusted? Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 00:58:37 +0200 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: <9la8jvgfdndt5klr8e7s4t1j2i3iuq19qd@4ax.com> Reply-To: postbus@sybrandb.demon.nl References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 20 Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:240140 On Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:44:15 -0500, Ed Stevens wrote: >What has me concerned about this is making the system tablespace the >default for the user oracle. Am I missing something or is Sun simply >blindly recommending the lowest common denominator default, kind of >like Oracle's poorly configured, shake-it-out-of-the-box starter >database? I wouldn't rely too much on Sun's Oracle expertise. The Suncluster 2.2 ha monitor didn't recognize the @ in init.ora parameters, which was really a pain, as they did use the background_dump_dest parameter from init.ora So, yes, they are blindly recommeding. Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address