Re: Orbitz blames Oracle for site outage

From: Keith <nospam_at_nospam.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:20:15 -0400
Message-ID: <vhdj6275up2re8@news.supernews.com>

"Vitriolic verbiage?" If you re-read my post, you will find none of this but objective posts.

David Fitzjarrell wrote:

> Keith <nospam_at_nospam.com> wrote in message news:<vhcj9d8s6q6vef_at_news.supernews.com>...
>

>>Can any complex system crafted by fallable humans, eg. Oracle RDBMS, 
>>Boeing 747 etc, be with certainty be called "unbreakable?"  When Oracle 
>>says that it is "unbreakable", does it mean it will never crash or be 
>>"cracked" by hackers?
>>
>>Keith wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sir, the post was on topic. Freedom of speech is a central tenet of the 
>>>internet. Perhaps you should apply for a job with A.G. John Ashcroft.
>>>
>>>The story underscores false advertisement of sorts. To say a product is 
>>>'unbreakable', as complex as it is, is in my opinion, irresponsible.
>>>

>
>
> Your opinion has been clearly stated with each derrogatory post you
> make to this newsgroup. You have absolutely no working knowledge of
> Oracle, yet you persist in badmouthing the product. Why is this? Are
> you paid by Postgres to plant seeds of doubt in the minds of Oracle
> users in hopes these same users will become disgruntled with a robust
> product that far outperforms Postgresql and jump ship? Or are you
> simply a troublemaker, not happy unless you've instigated some fracas
> over something you know little or nothing about?
>
> Take your vitriolic verbiage elsewhere, "Keith". It is not welcome
> here.
>
> David Fitzjarrell
Received on Thu Jul 17 2003 - 11:20:15 CDT