Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!prodigy.com!rip!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Daniel Morgan <damorgan@exxesolutions.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: What is a UDT?
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 14:34:05 -0700
Organization: EXE
Message-ID: <3F09E74D.C90EF818@exxesolutions.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3F085794.64CF69C@exxesolutions.com> <h8ZNa.5168$nP.2295@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net> <3f09deed_1@mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cache-Post-Path: yasure!unknown@pond178.drizzle.com
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 29
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:237099

Paul Brewer wrote:

> "DJ" <nospamplease@goaway.com> wrote in message
> news:h8ZNa.5168$nP.2295@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net...
> >
> > user defined type?
> >
> Useless Derivative Technology.
>
> Marketing rushed into an 'Object Relational Database' about 6 years ago, as
> I understand it because they felt threatened by something Informix had, and
> IBM might get.
> Now they're saddled with maintaining the legacy for the benefit of the
> suckers who believed them, whilst really hoping that it will be quietly
> forgotten.
>
> Regards,
> Paul

Take a good look at XML. Perhaps you'll change your mind. Or do you think it a
passing fad?   ;-)

--
Daniel Morgan
http://www.outreach.washington.edu/extinfo/certprog/oad/oad_crs.asp
damorgan@x.washington.edu
(replace 'x' with a 'u' to reply)


