Path: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!prodigy.com!rip!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!cyclone.bc.net!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: rgaffuri@cox.net (Ryan Gaffuri)
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: What is a UDT?
Date: 7 Jul 2003 03:38:37 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <1efdad5b.0307070238.462b56ab@posting.google.com>
References: <3F085794.64CF69C@exxesolutions.com> <0u4Oa.9416$ZT5.4182@news2.east.cox.net> <3F08D6F0.1D1D12F0@telusplanet.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.80.171.28
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1057574318 17823 127.0.0.1 (7 Jul 2003 10:38:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Jul 2003 10:38:38 GMT
Xref: newssvr20.news.prodigy.com comp.databases.oracle.server:237045

Hans Forbrich <forbrich@telusplanet.net> wrote in message news:<3F08D6F0.1D1D12F0@telusplanet.net>...
> Ryan wrote:
> 
> > looks like they snagged UDT from object oriented terminology. Where you have
> > your primitive data types such as ints, chars, etc... everything else is
> > created by the user. then everything which is created by the programmer.
> >
> > however, considering that most oracle people dont have Object oriented
> > backgrounds, you would think they would beef up the documentation. Now I
> > remember skimming the Object Type docs, and I think I remember a reference
> > to the term User defined data type, but they really should put 'UDT'
> > somewhere in the documentation to make it easier.
> >
> > btw, has anyone found the Oracle Object types(other than the arrays and REF
> >
> 
> Biggest silliness I see with  developers - reinventing data types - can be
> remedied with  UDTs ...
> 
> Q: how many variants of 'Address' definition can a company have?
> A: at least (# of programmers + 3) - assuming no 3rd pty vendors
> 
> Huge potential savings in maintenance cost alone - usually enough to be able to
> afford the increase in processor size (and then some).

that makes sense. didnt occur to me. I just use varchars for
addresses. however, having an object for an address could work.

thanks.
