Bravo! At least you have some people here that are open and objective,
and don't have Oracle's foot so far up their a*s that they can't
consider anything else could be used in place of paying Oracle $40,000
_per_cpu_. Doh!
Gerard H. Pille wrote:
> Not to be insulting but still saying that MS Access is up to my standards?
>
> What a strange sense of humor. I can imagine your customers screaming
> with laughter when you offer them advice. That is, until they get the
> bill.
>
> "PostgreSQL is worth exactly what you pay for it: Perhaps a bit more."
> Oracle has a hard time being worth a little more than what you pay for it.
>
> What could my customers do with that amount of money if they didn't
> spend it on Oracle? Imagine ...
Received on Sun Jun 22 2003 - 19:04:50 CDT
