Re: What's wrong with SQL Server?

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:06:10 +0100
Message-ID: <3ef0e1f9$0$18491$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com>

"joe buhl" <joseph.buhl_at_vspan.com> wrote in message news:f87cf429.0306180750.67338443_at_posting.google.com...
> > As opposed to IBM and M$ who got there with a crap product
> > and one of the most aggressive and unscrupulous sales organizations
>
> They pale in comparison to Oracles well documented exploits. I am no
> fan of Microsoft. We are fighting there db presence here. But you can
> only sell crap for so long before it catches up to you.

True. Unfortunately 'so long' appears to be defined as > 15 years. or 5 technology cycles.

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer
******************************************

Received on Wed Jun 18 2003 - 17:06:10 CDT