LGWR vs DBWn

From: Norman Dunbar <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 09:02:46 +0100
Message-ID: <E2F6A70FE45242488C865C3BC1245DA703CCAF79@lnewton.leeds.lfs.co.uk>

Morning SDG,

I suppose it would have helped if you'd ranted at whoever you were trying to rant at, rather than ranting at the original poster.

Have one of those nice day thingies !

Cheers,
Norm.

Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk

Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: sdg [mailto:nospan_at_noway.nohow.org] Posted At: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 5:12 AM Posted To: server
Conversation: LGWR vs DBWn
Subject: Re: LGWR vs DBWn

What's this, the Pink Panties tag team. You just can't resist reponding. Some more of your 'helpful replies' you are always ranting about.

Peter wrote:

> If it is the LGWR that writes the redo logs into the redo log buffer
> then what writes the redo logs into the redo log files? A system
> process?
> If it is the user process that writes the datablocks into the db
> buffer cache, then what writes those dirty data buffers into the the
> datafiles? Is it the DBWn?
>
> Thanks
Received on Tue Jun 17 2003 - 03:02:46 CDT