Re: poor man's standby

From: LeKaido <kaidol_at_bluff.ee>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:41:06 +0300
Message-ID: <3ee6f9e2_1@news.estpak.ee>

Unless I'm mistaken the slowdown is unavoidable. If I could use the Enterprise Edition's DataGuard feature, I'd be using it in the mode where logs are immediately applied on the standby database and I bet that would take some time too.

My goal with this solution is not to lose any data in the event of a crash or lose as little as possible.
So it's always about trading speed for reliability.

Do you have any idea how much slower the whole thing would be while using nfs in comparison to DataGuard solution when the two servers have a direct cable between them and are using a gigabit network connection?

K.L.

Sybrand Bakker wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2003 15:35:51 +0300, LeKaido <kaidol_at_bluff.ee> wrote:
>
>

>>I'd really appreciate your advice on this one.

>
>
> It will not be dependable and it will slowdown the database because of
> nfs
> I would recommend not implementing this set up, it is NOT going to
> work, and it is definitely not going to work when you don't oversee it
> on an ongoing basis.
>
>
>
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
> To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
Received on Wed Jun 11 2003 - 04:41:06 CDT