Re: refcursor for pipeline table function?

From: Richard Kuhler <noone_at_nowhere.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:52:43 GMT
Message-ID: <%itFa.44581$49.1368705@twister.socal.rr.com>

Jusung Yang wrote:
>
> Hmm... You sure? Can you show me the bugs? From this simple test, I
> did not see the problem you described. Here, using parallel enabled
> pipelined function, I want to transform data from 1 column based on
> the condition on another column. Namely

<snip>

Actually, I've never seen the parallel option even work. The function works fine but I've never seen it really create multiple processes and parallelize the data (like you can easily see with a typical parallel query). Have you seen it work before?

Richard Received on Tue Jun 10 2003 - 17:52:43 CDT