Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oh, this is so microsoftish ...

Re: Oh, this is so microsoftish ...

From: Noons <wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 20:13:49 +1000
Message-ID: <3ed0978a$0$16255$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>


"Tim X" <timx_at_spamto.devnul.com> wrote in message news:873cj3o06g.fsf_at_tiger.rapttech.com.au...

> In the end, I passed the problem onto my supervisor who passed it onto
> the chief IT officer who contacted the company directly and demanded
> support, which we then got. In the above two examples of support, I

Hehehe! Like I said: the end result of
all this is a "direct call" at management level.

Now: has ANYONE at Oracle priced the TRUE COST to the company in terms of long term customer damage of this new fangled "cheap support" policy?

Has ANYONE actually ADDED up how much it will cost the company in lost business in the long term?

Because THAT is a cost, like it or not.
And it MUST be accounted for when making quick and crappy Exel-based cost comparisons...

--
Cheers
Nuno Souto
wizofoz2k_at_yahoo.com.au.nospam
Received on Sun May 25 2003 - 05:13:49 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US