| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: IBM Debunks Oracle's MultiVersion Read Consistency ?
"Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message news:<3ea51f0a$0$29708$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>...
> "Robert Allen" <rallen_at_NOSPAMOKhgi.com> wrote in message
> news:b_yoa.380076$HU.52078_at_news.easynews.com...
> > http://www-
> > 3.ibm.com/software/data/pubs/papers/readconsistency/readconsistency.pdf
>
> I also should have mentioned that "running out of space=canceled
> transaction" in not necessarily true in 9i, the feature that may negate this
> is resumable space management, though I'd be fairly suspicious of the effect
> of resumable space management on a transactional app.
>
> You also ask what the advantages of MVRC are, they are at least the
> following.
>
> 1. Far less serialization
> 2. Readers don't block writers and vice versa.
> 3. You get a space management rather than a lock management overhead.
> 4. You don't get to wait for wrong answers if readers and writers are
> accessing the same table.
> 5. Flashback query
> 6. Database transactions can map one to one to business transactions.
Ora-1555 in particular can be solved with Oracle9i by using an adecuatedly sized undo tablespace Received on Mon May 12 2003 - 11:40:36 CDT
![]() |
![]() |