Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: patch with no testing

Re: patch with no testing

From: horse person <cameron.cleland_at_ci.sj.ca.us>
Date: 2 May 2003 09:08:15 -0700
Message-ID: <ee3c77d3.0305020808.6c0ac0ba@posting.google.com>


There are good reasons to patch even if there are no obvious problems.  Oracle patch sets improve performance, protect against data corruption, fix incorrect results, solve memory leaks, improve security, etc, etc. So just because you are not receiving an error doesnt mean a patch shouldn't be applied.

So I ask again: what is safer? running unpatched or patching without testing? To me it is safer to patch with no testing since the patches fix so many errors, and is thoroughly tested by oracle. Received on Fri May 02 2003 - 11:08:15 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US