Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: a performance question

Re: a performance question

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 15:46:09 GMT
Message-ID: <5tGea.192058$S_4.102741@rwcrnsc53>


Hard to say. An explain plan and a tkprof would have helped a lot. Jim

--
Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
with family.  Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign.  You can figure
it out.
"Jay" <jwu_at_nctr.fda.gov> wrote in message
news:_AFea.60$N5.4917_at_mencken.net.nih.gov...

> I have a table that has about 100,000 records. The primary key has type of
> number. When I did a 'update column=value where primary_key > number and
> primary < number (about 100 records), it took about 15 minutes. Our
database
> server is a capable machine and this slow update is totally upacceptible.
> After we dropped the table and recreated it, the same update took less
than
> 1 second. I am wondering what change within the datase has made the huge
> performance difference. Thanks.
>
> Jay
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 21 2003 - 09:46:09 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US