Path: news.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed.frii.net!newsfeed.frii.net!out.nntp.be!propagator2-SanJose!in.nntp.be!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!news.xtra.co.nz!news.mel.connect.com.au!news1.optus.net.au!optus!news.optus.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "M2" <me@quietplaceiwithnospam.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Limit on number of values for list partition?
Lines: 9
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Message-ID: <k3S8a.43$L14.6312@news.optus.net.au>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 00:03:28 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.166.134.204
X-Trace: news.optus.net.au 1046736208 137.166.134.204 (Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:03:28 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 11:03:28 EST
Xref: newsfeed1.easynews.com comp.databases.oracle.server:178330
X-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 17:03:21 MST (news.easynews.com)

Hi All,
I am thinking of using list based partitioning for a date warehousing
application. In order to have range based partitioning work for me I would
need to have as many as a 1000-2000 values. Would these kinds of numbers
work? Would they be efficient?

Matt.