Path: news.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news.he.net!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!news2.epix.net!news1.epix.net!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3E639B8E.5040100@epix.net>
From: John Kachurick <jokach@epix.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.01
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. MS SQL Server
References: <ckK8a.17471$u12.6366591@news.alltel.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 12
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:14:40 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.74.63.70
X-Complaints-To: abuse@epix.net
X-Trace: news1.epix.net 1046715280 209.74.63.70 (Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:14:40 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 13:14:40 EST
Xref: newsfeed1.easynews.com comp.databases.oracle.server:178287
X-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 11:14:35 MST (news.easynews.com)

I have an interesting white paper that does a comparison basically 
feature by feature if you're interested. Email me out of the group if 
you want a copy of it.

John

Phil wrote:
> Looking for a completed evaluation comparing Oracle with MS SQL Server. Any
> ideas?
> 
>