Path: news.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!sjc72.webusenet.com!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: DA Morgan Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: Oracle vs. MS SQL Server Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 08:41:19 -0800 Organization: EXE Message-ID: <3E6385AF.CE39FF8E@exesolutions.com> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cache-Post-Path: yasure!unknown@splish28.drizzle.com X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Lines: 13 Xref: newsfeed1.easynews.com comp.databases.oracle.server:178273 X-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 09:41:47 MST (news.easynews.com) Phil wrote: > Looking for a completed evaluation comparing Oracle with MS SQL Server. Any > ideas? Define your requirements very carefully first. Remember that the product, no matter which product, is a minor part of the total cost of ownership. Evaluate cost of training, hardware, maintenance, downtime, etc. too. Daniel Morgan