Path: news.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news.he.net!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: timasmith@hotmail.com (Tim Smith)
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms,comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: oracle benchmarks on VMS
Date: 2 Mar 2003 22:39:05 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <a7234bb1.0303022239.54fc5685@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.156.158.80
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1046673545 16909 127.0.0.1 (3 Mar 2003 06:39:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Mar 2003 06:39:05 GMT
Xref: newsfeed1.easynews.com comp.os.vms:351779 comp.databases.oracle.server:178215
X-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 23:38:58 MST (news.easynews.com)

I see Oracle publishes some benchmarks at
http://www.oracle.com/apps_benchmark/, but notably there is nothing
for VMS - is that because Oracle writes to the filesystem, not direct
to device file files directly i.e. VMS filesystem is a lot slower than
raw devices?

If anyone has older benchmarks that include VMS I would like to see
them.

thanks!

Tim