| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
 |
 | |||
| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
|
| |||
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9i under NT and Linux
Jim Kennedy wrote:
> I don't think it mentioned it. He did show how he benchmarked and came to
> his conclusions for his set up. So the best thing is to test it and see
> what works best for you.
> Jim
>
> --
> Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
> with family. Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure
> it out.
> "Tim X" <timx_at_spamto.devnul.com> wrote in message
> news:87n0lgr5wo.fsf_at_tiger.rapttech.com.au...
>
>>>>>>>"Frank" == Frank <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> writes: >>>>>> >> Frank> Jim Kennedy wrote: >> >> I saw an excellent article on otn.oracle.com about this. It >> >> talked about different file systems on Linux and what worked best >> >> for Oracle. Give it a read, I think it is still on the main page. >> >> Jim -- >> >> >> Replace part of the email address: >> >> kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com with family. Remove the >> >> negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure it out. >> >> "Jean" <x_at_y.z> wrote in message >> >> news:b1e5b1$t4n$1_at_news-reader12.wanadoo.fr... >> >> >> >> >>> Hello, >> >>> >> >>> I have installed 9i under Windows and Linux. >> >>> >> >>> I feel that it works slower under Linux. I have noticed a lot of >> >>> disk I/O. >> >>> >> >>> Is there something to do to enhance IO opération or is it a >> >>> Linux specificity ? >> >>> >> >>> Jean >> >>> >> >>> PS : I don't want a debate Win vs Linux ... >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Frank> Yup - bottom line: ext2 is best - raw fs only marinally >> Frank> faster. Much to the surprise of the tester. >> >>What about ext3 which is a journalled filesystem? >> >>Tim >> >>-- >>Tim Cross >>The e-mail address on this message is FALSE (obviously!). My real e-mail
>>to a company in Australia called rapttech and my login is tcross - if you >>really need to send mail, you should be able to work it out!
ext3 was _a lot_ slower and the OP wondered about speed.
Frank Received on Sat Feb 01 2003 - 13:41:40 CST
 |
 |