I don't think it mentioned it. He did show how he benchmarked and came to
his conclusions for his set up. So the best thing is to test it and see
what works best for you.
Jim
--
Replace part of the email address: kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com
with family. Remove the negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure
it out.
"Tim X" <timx_at_spamto.devnul.com> wrote in message
news:87n0lgr5wo.fsf_at_tiger.rapttech.com.au...
> >>>>> "Frank" == Frank <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net> writes:
>
> Frank> Jim Kennedy wrote:
> >> I saw an excellent article on otn.oracle.com about this. It
> >> talked about different file systems on Linux and what worked best
> >> for Oracle. Give it a read, I think it is still on the main page.
> >> Jim --
>
> >> Replace part of the email address:
> >> kennedy-down_with_spammers_at_attbi.com with family. Remove the
> >> negative part, keep the minus sign. You can figure it out.
> >> "Jean" <x_at_y.z> wrote in message
> >> news:b1e5b1$t4n$1_at_news-reader12.wanadoo.fr...
> >>
>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I have installed 9i under Windows and Linux.
> >>>
> >>> I feel that it works slower under Linux. I have noticed a lot of
> >>> disk I/O.
> >>>
> >>> Is there something to do to enhance IO opération or is it a
> >>> Linux specificity ?
> >>>
> >>> Jean
> >>>
> >>> PS : I don't want a debate Win vs Linux ...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> Frank> Yup - bottom line: ext2 is best - raw fs only marinally
> Frank> faster. Much to the surprise of the tester.
>
> What about ext3 which is a journalled filesystem?
>
> Tim
>
> --
> Tim Cross
> The e-mail address on this message is FALSE (obviously!). My real e-mail
is
> to a company in Australia called rapttech and my login is tcross - if you
> really need to send mail, you should be able to work it out!
Received on Fri Jan 31 2003 - 22:41:05 CST
