Re: portability

From: Frank <fvanbortel_at_netscape.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 21:24:21 +0100
Message-ID: <3E1B3775.3020403@netscape.net>

Niall Litchfield wrote:
> "dmz17" <dmz17_at_nospam.nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:pan.2003.01.05.21.56.48.283429_at_nospam.nowhere.com...
>

>>If I had my way, nobody would use PL/SQL because they would not be
>>portable.

>
>
> And If I had my way people would analyse their business needs, buy or
> develop an app to meet them and then stick with it as long as the business
> needs required. If you are changing one thing (as portability implies) then
> you can be damn sure the business has changed. Portability (like object
> orientation or almost any other buzzword you can think of) suits developers
> far more than end users and businesses.
>
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission UK
> *****************************************
> Please include version and platform
> and SQL where applicable
> It makes life easier and increases the
> likelihood of a good answer
> ******************************************
>
>

Hear, hear. I'll buy you a pint of bitter or a nice whisky next time I'm in the neighbourhood.

Frank Received on Tue Jan 07 2003 - 14:24:21 CST