Hmm... If by the keyword "Java" you are referring to J2EE then I hope
you are right. :) If you are referring to the language - I doubt it. As
Mr. Morgan noted, we have a lot of better alternatives to C, but it's still
here after over 30 years since its introduction. Same's with Pascal,
COBOL and just about any other language or technology that got
some acceptance and had money and effort invested into it - you don't
seriously expect businesses just to dump all their investments, throw
away all their current systems and go look for some new buzzword to
invest into?
--
Vladimir Zakharychev (bob@dpsp-yes.com) http://www.dpsp-yes.com
Dynamic PSP(tm) - the first true RAD toolkit for Oracle-based internet applications.
All opinions are mine and do not necessarily go in line with those of my employer.
"dunesky" <dunesky_at_somewhere.com> wrote in message news:3e07ca72$1_at_news.userve.net...
> I'm afraid Oracle have chosen a bad technology to base their future database
> products on.
>
> Java is still a very poor technology and after having nearly 10 years in the
> limelight it is going to feel the pinch severely in the new year.
>
> Please don't get me wrong, I'm no .Net fan, but Java has had years to be
> successful yet it's short comings are far too prevelant.
>
> .Net may come to the rescue, I doubt it,so the field is now wide open for
> better technologies.
>
>
Received on Tue Dec 24 2002 - 05:08:10 CST
