Howard J. Rogers wrote:
> Ah. *Real* hardware, then!
>
> Out of my league, I'm afraid.
>
> But you can't be the only person in the world running it. And the other
> person must surely look in here sometimes....
>
> ??
>
> :-)
> HJR
>
>
> "Joachim Mueller-Imm" <muim_at_uniserv.de> wrote in message
> news:5i6sta.hvu.ln_at_news.uniserv.de...
>
>>Thank you for your comment.
>>It is really Linux/390 31-bit that we are runing on an IBM mainframe.
>>
>>Regards
>>JMI
>>
>>"Howard J. Rogers" <howardjr2000_at_yahoo.com.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>news:bSfM9.6279$jM5.18072_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
>>
>>>Daft question, maybe: but what sort of box are you attempting to install
>>>this on.
>>>
>>>I thought the Linux/390 version was purely for that mother of an IBM box
>>>that has a billion virtual Linux servers running within it.
>>>
>>>If it's just a plain old Intel box running some standard el-cheapo Linux
>>>distro, then you downloaded the wrong version. There's a plain old Linux
>>>download for such critters.
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>HJR
>>>
>>>"Joachim Mueller-Imm" <muim_at_uniserv.de> wrote in message
>>>news:26urta.4ju.ln_at_news.uniserv.de...
>>>
>>>>I downloaded "Oracle9i Database Enterprise Edition Release 2 for
>>>
>>>Linux/390"
>>>
>>>>from
>>>
>>http://otn.oracle.com/software/products/oracle9i/htdocs/390soft.html.
>>
>>>>The shell script Disk1/runInstaller starts the binary
>>>>Disk1/install/linux/runInstaller. This program immediately fails with
>>>
>>the
>>
>>>>message:
>>>>"cannot execute binary file"
>>>>
>>>>Disk1/install/linux/runInstaller seems to be a valid Linux/390 binary,
>>>>because executing
>>>>'file Disk1/install/linux/runInstaller'
>>>>yields:
>>>>"ELF 32-bit MSB executable, version 1, dynamically linked (uses shared
>>>>libs), not stripped".
>>>>
>>>>What else might be wrong here?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Knowing nothing about this architecture, I'll just shoot in
the dark: do you have the correct permissions? I.e. is the
file executable?
Frank
Received on Fri Dec 20 2002 - 02:51:24 CST
