| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Bye Oracle.
How many processors were you running on? $1,000,000 implies 25 processors at the $40k/processor list price for Enterprise edition. This is the most you would have had to pay. Oracle always negotiates on price.
Are you saying you can out SQL server on 25 processors for $10K ($400/processor) and DB2 UDB on 25 processors for $20K ($800/processor).
And were these all top level versions of the databases
(Enterprise Edition)?
I agree that Oracle is more expensive than the others, but I can't
believ it is 100 times more expensive.
IF you could provide more detail, it would be great. It's claims like these that make my life miserable when management see's them.
Patrick
Originally posted by Chuck
> "Karsten Farrell" wrote in message
> news:LNPC9.33$8o5.4324386_at_newssvr14.news.prodigy.com"]news:LNPC-
> 9.33$8o5.4324386_at_newssvr14.news.prodigy.com[/url]...
> > NorwoodThree wrote:
> > > Our company is trying to phase out Oracle in favor of SQL
> Server due
> > > to licensing costs for our data warehouse.
> > >
> > > I dont want to cause a huge thread, but is there a link
> somewhere that
> > > explains the disadvantages to this? I dont know anything
> about SQL
> > > Server. I know there have been threads as to "Oracle vs. SQL
> Server"
> > > but it doesnt answer my question directly. I want to stick
> with
> > > Oracle.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > Call your Oracle sales person. I'm sure they have *lots* of
> white papers
> > that will tell you why Oracle is better than SQL Server.
>
-- Posted via http://dbforums.comReceived on Thu Nov 21 2002 - 14:08:53 CST
![]() |
![]() |