Re: 90GB table on Windows 2000

"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:appcbt$qtb$1 $8300dec7_at_news.demon.co.uk:

>
> Correct,
>
> There were no problems due to 'simple volume'; but there were
> various 'mechanical' constraints on data arrival, and query
> requirements that added some interesting implementation details -
> which then ran into a seemingly endless stream of 'interesting'
> side-effects. In short, most of the problems were arguably bugs -
> mostly fixed in newer versions.

It's very _unfortunate_ that I can _completely_ empathize with you ...

-- 
Pablo Sanchez, High-Performance Database Engineering
http://www.hpdbe.com