Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 90GB table on Windows 2000

Re: 90GB table on Windows 2000

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 08:57:11 +0100
Message-ID: <3da68457$0$1292$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


"Jim Stern" <jdstern_at_k2services.com> wrote in message news:ao52s5$fdl$1_at_news.utelfla.com...
> Damn right... NT is definitely a no no for real critical applications, too
> many variables for the O/S to be stable.

Are you sure this isn't just a knee jerk response. We have 2000 servers running line of business apps that have been up for (checks uptime) 118 days. The downtime was for power work. Setup correctly windows 2000 *is* a stable OS. Now I'm not suggesting that we move apps supporting 10,000 users across to win2k from Solaris or HPUX or whatever, but windows is now a perfectly satisfactory server operating system. Moreover in this particular case the application appears to be a single table app storing logs or stats or some such.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer

******************************************
Received on Fri Oct 11 2002 - 02:57:11 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US