Path: news.easynews.com!newsfeed1.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!nntp.infostrada.it!i2unix!not-for-mail From: S2 Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: Re: create package Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:08:12 +0200 Organization: IUnet Lines: 40 Message-ID: <3DA56DAC.5050102@mail.com> References: <3DA2F872.2020202@mail.com> <92eeeff0.0210081524.6f1a8b81@posting.google.com> <3DA3CDCB.5070302@mail.com> <3DA46962.5030809@mail.com> <1869quc1evdg93g5t540395ng93dsk8r9h@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: merlin2.provinz.bz.it Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: serv1.iunet.it 1034251689 11090 62.101.0.30 (10 Oct 2002 12:08:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@iunet.it NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Oct 2002 12:08:09 GMT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Xref: newsfeed1.easynews.com comp.databases.oracle.server:163716 X-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 05:30:10 MST (news.easynews.com) Sybrand Bakker wrote: > On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 17:37:43 GMT, S2 wrote: > > >>hi Bakker, tnx for your answer and the time you spend behind this thread. >>maybe i did not explain myself right. > > > > I consider greeting someone by his last name as being intentionally > rude. i consider your statements rude as well. is this a problem? or are we just wasting precious space on the newsserver and bandwith of our providers? > > So finally it appears what we are really discussing is version > control. i newer heard about that. Rauf Sarwar's post was very helpful to me, and i will inform me about it. > Why you would archive previous versions of an algorithm in > the database is beyond me, well, just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean it hasn't to be that way. > you would do better using Toad in > conjunction with Visual Source Safe. that would implicate manual intervention by the developer (we). this can not be done. > And yes, you have a serious problem in your development methodology, > if you allow changing your code every few days. this is not going to happening every few day. this is going to happening 1 or 2 times at year. -- regards, Simon