Message-ID: <3D7CFFB1.D02C00AC@exesolutions.com>
From: Daniel Morgan <dmorgan@exesolutions.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Rollback tablespace size
References: <3d7cee7f.5017214@news.hccnet.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 19
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 20:08:59 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.74.250.7
X-Complaints-To: yvonne.tracy@ci.seattle.wa.us
X-Trace: news-west.eli.net 1031602139 156.74.250.7 (Mon, 09 Sep 2002 14:08:59 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 14:08:59 MDT
Organization: City of Seattle NewsReader Service


76434.1353@compuserve.com wrote:

> What should be the size of the rollback tablespace datafile?
> Is there a relation between the size of the rollback and the user
> tablespace and or rollback segments?

There is no simple answer to your question.

One answer would be that it should be large enough to handle every
simultaneously connected user running the largest SQL statement
simultaneously such that each and every rollback segment becomes large
enough to hold the transaction.

Without knowing a lot of very specific information about the system it
is impossible to say. My answer would be to ask if any problems
currently exist.

Daniel Morgan


