From: Richard <stuppiddickhead@postmaster.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.informix,comp.databases.ibm-db2,comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: DB2 or Oracle
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 09:29:13 +0100
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <3D7C5BD9.40005@postmaster.co.uk>
References: <al55mf02iuq@drn.newsguy.com> <al567402ls2@drn.newsguy.com> <pan.2002.09.07.17.30.01.656374.2067@blackhole.nospam.com> <3D7B40D1.9040107@ca.ibm.com> <3d7b4ad2$0$29907$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <3D7B7663.4070909@ca.ibm.com> <dd5cc559.0209082104.46191ca7@posting.google.com> <3D7C423E.8060500@postmaster.co.uk> <3d7c59dd$0$1285$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: sungold3.nl.ibm.com (195.212.29.99)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1031559981 60709156 195.212.29.99 (16 [64669])
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en


Niall Litchfield wrote:
> "Richard" <stuppiddickhead@postmaster.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3D7C423E.8060500@postmaster.co.uk...
> 
>>Nuno Souto wrote:
>>
>>>Serge Rielau <srielau@ca.ibm.com> wrote in message
>>
> news:<3D7B7663.4070909@ca.ibm.com>...
> 
>>>>Hmm, mainframes don't count BUT evil DB2 unses a different codebase
>>>>there, shame on them an hence don't buy it for the other platforms..
>>>>Do I sense schizophrenia by competitive marketing here????
>>>
>>>You may recall more than a year ago I was vilified for stating as
>>>a fact what is now recognized as truth.  Back then, I was the bad boy.
>>>Now, it's "of course".
>>>
>>>BTW, I never said DB2 is "evil", it's your statement not mine.
>>>
>>>What I said back then (and everyone made a tremendous effort to
>>>discredit me) was that the codebase for zSeries and AS400 is NOT
>>>the same as for the others.  And therefore IBM cannot claim,
>>>like they did back then, that there was only one codebase
>>>for DB2. It's bull, always was.
>>
>>This is an interesting discovery. I've certainly heard the "same code"
>>mantra a thousand times.
> 
> What difference does it make? Or rather what difference is it claimed to
> make.

It undermines the credibility of the person making the assertion.

Oh, I see what you mean. I think the benefit of a single code base is 
that you can use your resources more effectively. But since no-one 
actually has a single code base, by the sound of it...


