Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Veritas's implementation/interpretation of RAID 0+1 and RAID 10

Re: Veritas's implementation/interpretation of RAID 0+1 and RAID 10

From: Darren Dunham <ddunham_at_redwood.taos.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:31:20 GMT
Message-ID: <sfP89.2859$Bv2.183530828@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>


In comp.unix.solaris Chuck Swiger <chuck_at_codefab.com> wrote:
> Also note that what you said here:

>> Right. Although the setup makes it appear to be 0+1, it's really doing >> 1+0 under the covers.

> ...suggests that DiskSuite is smart enough to understand and perhaps even
> load-balance data available on multiple drives, which would explain why the
> same reads and writes happen to all of the disks, regardless of 0+1 vs. 1+0.

I would exect no difference in read/write behavior (in a non-failure case) between 0+1 and 1+0. Obviously the two behave *very* differently when failure is detected.

I don't know if SDS/LVM is doing real load balancing or just round-robin reads. I've assumed the latter, but would happily accept it if it's smarter than than.

-- 
Darren Dunham                                           ddunham_at_taos.com
Unix System Administrator                    Taos - The SysAdmin Company
Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >
Received on Wed Aug 21 2002 - 11:31:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US