That's lovely Richard. I've got a warm glow now from the reflected love
from this thread.
"Chuck" <chuckh_at_softhome.net> wrote in message
news:ahjqt1$u2km7$1_at_ID-85580.news.dfncis.de...
> Thanks for that positive redirecton.
> --
> Chuck
>
> "Richard Foote" <richard.foote_at_bigpond.com> wrote in message
> news:yM1%8.41533$Hj3.124410_at_newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
> > Chuck and Sybrand,
> >
> > OK, this is what I want you to do.
> >
> > Close your eyes and via a telepathic link (I'm afraid at DB link won't
> > suffice) imagine a good old fashioned group hug. That's it, a great big
> > cuddle, doesn't that feel nice. Feel the love being exchanged. It's a
> > beautiful sensation.
> >
> > Now one last squeeze and promise each other that next time you read each
> > other's posts you'll say to yourselves, "Hey, that's my buddy again
making
> a
> > positive contribution to this NG. I don't necessarily agree with what
he's
> > saying, but gee it's great to hear from him again".
> >
> > Now break off the telepathic link, smile and have a nice cuppa.
> >
> > Richard :)
> >
> > "Chuck" <chuckh_at_softhome.net> wrote in message
> > news:ahhb85$sfgpi$1_at_ID-85580.news.dfncis.de...
> > >
> > > "Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message
> > > news:ll7ijusg9bgmpm1mird4v3f23al8ovp2sb_at_4ax.com...
> > > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2002 21:41:35 GMT, Enkidu Utnapishtim
> > > > <utnapishtim43NOSPAM_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >Chuck,
> > > > >Disregarding Sybrand's ego trip (it's a lot easier to make
> non-helpful
> > > > >statements like "millions of people use it" than to answer a
> question),
> > > > >you are right. Both exp/imp have problems
> > > >
> > > > The OP labeled the utility as a piece of crap. That definitely is
NOT
> > >
> > > Better reread the OP. I asked if it was. I didn't state it was. But as
> > said
> > > before given all the problems I've found in it every time I try to
push
> it
> > > beyond the simplest of tasks, I will not use it for anthing but the
> > simplest
> > > of tasks. It has proven over and over that that's all it can handle.
> > >
> > > > true. Views can end up invalid, and they can be compiled afterwards
> > >
> > > But at least it gets the DDL correct. It screws up on grants and
> datafile
> > > sizes. You are wrong again (I am amazed that anyone would believe
> anything
> > > you say on any Oracle topic at this point).
> > >
> > > > Is that a problem? Come on, get a life. If you have issues with exp,
> > > > why don't you submit a TAR? No support contract, I guess.
> > >
> > > Wrong again Mr. know-it-all. TAR was opened before you and your ego
the
> > size
> > > of Texas ever jumped in. And BTW when I spoke to OTS they agreed that
> > these
> > > things *ARE* problems. Of course I'm sure you still think you know
more
> > than
> > > they do. People with egos as big as yours are never wrong, are they?
> > >
> > > > Well in that case, if you think you know better, and replace exp, by
> > > > your own scripts, be my guest. But don't start making unjustified
> > > > remarks in a forum they don't belong, and don't try to hide your own
> > > > ignorance by resorting to pseudonyms and to rants and flames.
> > >
> > > Better take your own advice. What do you call this post that I am
> replying
> > > too.
> > >
> > > > Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
> > >
> > > Which is important only in your own mind. Nobody else gives a hoot. If
> you
> > > want to play in a public forum you'd better brush up on your social
> > skills.
> > > In that area you are completely inept. You wouldn't believe the number
> of
> > > private replies I've gotten from others who can't stand you either. My
> bet
> > > is it would be easier to count those who can than those who can't.
> > >
> > > My "rant" has little do to with IMP/EXP and more to do with an
> egotistical
> > > asshole who thinks he's better than everyone else but in reality
doesn't
> > > know his ass from a hole in the ground. Better hope I am never in an
> > > audience where you are speaking. I will put you on the spot and make
> sure
> > to
> > > humiliate you publicly just as you try to do to others. It would be
good
> > for
> > > you to be knocked down a few notches, and it wouldn't be hard after
> > reading
> > > your posts and seeing your limited practical knowledge.
> > > --
> > > Chuck
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Jul 23 2002 - 10:28:43 CDT
