Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: datafiles and tempfiles
"Howard J. Rogers" wrote:
> Well, as a Microsoft fan (sorry, Nuno!), I just want someone running ye olde
> NT 4 to do exactly the same test as I did and report the results. Then I can
> sleep at nights.
>
> Cat with an attitude problem willing.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
> "Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
> news:3d217b5b$0$28005$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> > In article <afrrs0$uof$1_at_lust.ihug.co.nz>, you said (and I quote):
> >
> > > realise too late that NT wouldn't know a sparse file if it came up and
> hit
> > > it with a mackerel.
> >
> > Sounds fishy, no? :-D
> >
> >
> > > Yet I know for sure that the Hobart NT demo was about as successful as
> me
> > > doing my "juggling three swords and a firestick whilst doing trampoline
> > > demonstrations" party trick. In other words, not very.
> > >
> > > Did things change between NT and W2K/XP?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, they did. NTFS changed dramatically for 2K and once again for XP,
> > although not by as much. Watch out for major differences too between XP
> > Pro and the ".NET server"...
> >
> > I don't think your delay was caused just by Oracle formatting or not. I
> > think it has to do with how NT's version of NTFS allocates a sparse file
> > (it MUST write all the intervening blocks, like it or not) and how
> > 2K/XP's version of NTFS behaves in such a situation.
> >
> > Don't you love the consistency of Microslop's naming? I mean, it's NTFS
> > after all only because M$ claims so: they couldn't be more different!
> >
> > Mark Minasi pointed out this differences problem ages ago in NT
> > magazine, when 2K came out. He got immediately blasted by Microslop, of
> > course...
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > Nuno Souto
> > nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam
Just did the following:
SQL> SET TIMING ON
SQL> CREATE TEMPORARY TABLESPACE temptest TEMPFILE
'c:\temp\temptest01.dbf' SIZE 400M;
Tablespace created.
Elapsed: 00:00:04.16
SQL>
on an IBM 380Z ThinkPad, 300MHz CPU with 64MB RAM, WinNT 4 SP 6, Oracle
8.1.7.0.0 Enterprise Edition. The disks are configured as NTFS.
It certainly can't be slower than this on any extant machine.
Daniel Morgan Received on Tue Jul 02 2002 - 11:21:10 CDT
![]() |
![]() |