Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 8.1.7.3 and the shared pool

Re: 8.1.7.3 and the shared pool

From: Anton Buijs <aammbuijs_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 21:28:48 +0200
Message-ID: <aeo1jb$rst$1@news1.xs4all.nl>


That's true, no explanation. Must say I don't have that experience. Recently upgrade a small database from V8.0.6 to V8.1.7.3. Some to do on VMS from V8.0.5. But will try to find out.
And also can't imagine why. You did not change any other parameters (like cursor_space_for_time or so)? Or changed defaults? Just guessing.

Scott Gamble <zifnab_at_reddragon.org> schreef in berichtnieuws VnLP8.5619$Bz4.30905_at_petpeeve.ziplink.net...
| "Anton Buijs" <aammbuijs_at_xs4all.nl> wrote in
| news:aentb1$hm1$1_at_news1.xs4all.nl:
|
| > Sounds like your database is a candidate for using the (new) init.ora
| > parameter CURSOR_SHARING=force.
| > Literal strings are replaced by bind variables before the statement is
| > loaded in the shared pool. Later the literal values are binded. This
| > could significantly reduce the number of different statements in the
| > shared pool in your case.
| >
| > Read Metalink note 94036.1 " Init.ora Parameter "CURSOR_SHARING"
| > Reference Note".
| > Bugs are reported too! (It's a new feature you know).
| >
|
| It is a perfect candidate for it and is in the plans to do at some point
| down the road (doubtful on 8.1.7.3 we have hit enough bugs with it in 1.5
| months of using it that management is going to be very leary of the new
| features). This still doesn't explain why 8.1.7.3 needs so much more
| space.
|
| Scott
Received on Tue Jun 18 2002 - 14:28:48 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US