Path: news.easynews.com!easynews!news.he.net!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!news.maxwell.syr.edu!mango.news.easynet.net!easynet.net!easynet-post1!not-for-mail
From: Andrew Mobbs <andrewm@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.oracle.server
Subject: Re: Times spent on latches...fast responses gratefully appreciated.
References: <BsrL8.1585$NV6.77522@news8-gui.server.ntli.net> <b3cb12d6.0206051434.2449bef9@posting.google.com>
Organization: Antique and shadowy Khem
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Originator: andrewm@chiark.greenend.org.uk ([212.135.138.206])
Date: 06 Jun 2002 09:45:49 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <brb*pH8pp@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Lines: 9
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.135.138.206
X-Trace: 1023353019  4747 212.135.138.206
Xref: easynews comp.databases.oracle.server:149709
X-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 03:46:21 MST (news.easynews.com)

Yong Huang <yong321@yahoo.com> wrote:
>_kgl_latch_count = 23

Is there a disadvantage to just sticking this up to 67 and leaving it
there? (Other than the obvious support issues of undocumented
parameters.)

-- 
Andrew Mobbs - http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~andrewm/
