Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Can a Function-Based Index do this?
This follows from a previous thread (see: "Testing for Existence of Rows -
What's Fastest?"). A function based index was recommended but I'm only now
probing for details.
Basically we want to establish uniqueness on a field value, but the
uniqueness doesn't apply to the whole table, just to groups of records.
Consider a table called "orders." For records of order_type "A", we want to
check that the field po_num is unique for certain records. We have a trigger
(after insert on "orders") that does this; it looks something like this
(pseudocode):
IF :new.order_type = "A" THEN
SELECT count(*)
INTO num_recs
FROM orders
WHERE order_whse = :new.order_whse
AND cust_id = :new.cust_id
AND po_num = :new.po_num;
END IF;
--I may be using ":new" wrong here; I
--don't have the code in front of me
IF num_recs > 1 THEN
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(...)
END IF;
So we want to check that no orders with the new po_num already exist, for
orders for a certain customer from a certain warehouse. Note that it should
find one record (itself) since this is an after insert trigger. (Doing it
before the insert causes a mutating table error, so there's actually some
trickery in place to make this work. We use the old trick of writing values
to package variables on a before trigger).
I'd like to do away with all this, since two triggers and a package are needed--not to mention that the SELECT COUNT(*) takes a long time on this table. Can a function-based index on the table handle this? If so, how? All I've found on the web talks about case sensitivity and such--nothing like this.
Thanks in advance.
-jk Received on Sun Jun 02 2002 - 19:08:57 CDT
![]() |
![]() |