| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Finding users who have dynamically set SORT_AREA_SIZE
Hi
To me it does not seem to be reliable: Win2000, 8.1.7.0.0
Sysdba:
SQL> show parameter sort
NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ------- ------------------------------
nls_sort string sort_area_retained_size integer 16384 sort_area_size integer 32768 sort_multiblock_read_count integer 2
User sort_dump:
select * from all_tables
order by table_name;
Statistics
8 recursive calls
9 db block gets
17254 consistent gets
14 physical reads
0 redo size
22286 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
2090 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
17 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
1 sorts (disk)
238 rows processed
OK -> disk sort
SQL>
SQL> select sid from v$mystat
2 where rownum =1;
SID
8
Sysdba:
SQL> oradebug setorapid 8
Statement processed.
SQL> oradebug dump global_area 4
Statement processed.
SQL>
In trace:
stpdef stsustp_p [5ED8220, 5ED8248) = 0000C000 00004000 00000001 00000002
...
Note: Oracle for sort_area_size shows more than specified
User sort_dump:
SQL> alter session set sort_area_size=1000000;
Session altered.
Statistics
8 recursive calls
6 db block gets
17254 consistent gets
7 physical reads
0 redo size
22284 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
2090 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
17 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
238 rows processed
Good, bigger sort size -> sort in memory
Trace show the same: (old trace renamed)
stpdef stsustp_p [398220, 398248) = 0000C000 00004000 00000001 00000002 ...
Test repeated 15 times ( To avoid possibility of mistake when process doesn't sort )
Did I miss something?
Igor Received on Thu May 16 2002 - 12:53:32 CDT
![]() |
![]() |