Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Bad Generalisations by Don Burleson

Re: Bad Generalisations by Don Burleson

From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 19:58:57 +0100
Message-ID: <3cdc1874$0$8513$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com>


"Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:3cdbe511$0$15149$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> We all know that many of these books are produced by the metre, with
> contributions from many "cut and pasted" and slapped with the author's
> name as the origin. Wrong.

what we all know oftentimes has a habit of being entirely incorrect. Its true of 'space in an index is never reused', but its also true of 'high page count books are produced by cut and paste'. hell probably three times out of ten I can't type Select ... accurately. cut and paste might improve my productivity!

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
Received on Fri May 10 2002 - 13:58:57 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US