Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: alter tablespace fails but makes commit
In article <962f505f.0205071456.6bf1cdc0_at_posting.google.com>,
pgomeza_at_adinet.com.uy says...
>
>Consider this transaction:
>
DDL is conceptually done like this:
begin
COMMIT;
begin
do your ddl COMMIT; exception when others then ROLLBACK; RAISE;
all ddl commits before and maybe after it happens.
>
>SQL> commit;
>Commit complete.
>
>SQL> select * from emp;
>no rows selected
>
>SQL> insert into emp (empno, deptno) values (100, 10);
>1 row created.
>
>SQL> select * from emp;
> EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL
>COMM
>---------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------
>----------
> DEPTNO
>----------
> 100
> 10
>
>SQL> alter tablespace a123 offline;
>alter tablespace a123 offline
>*
>ERROR at line 1:
>ORA-00959: tablespace 'A123' does not exist
>
>SQL> rollback;
>Rollback complete.
>
>SQL> select * from emp;
> EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL
>COMM
>---------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------
>----------
> DEPTNO
>----------
> 100
> 10
>
>
>As I can see the "alter tablespace ..." command makes a commit, what
>it's ok because is a ddl sentence, but I didn't know that when this
>sentence fails it makes a commit, like in this example where the
>tablespace not exits.
>
>Is this ok? Are there other situations similars where happens the
>same?
>
>Pablo Gomez Aguilera
>Twins Informatica
>Montevideo-Uruguay
-- Thomas Kyte (tkyte@oracle.com) http://asktom.oracle.com/ Expert one on one Oracle, programming techniques and solutions for Oracle. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1861004826/ Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle CorpReceived on Tue May 07 2002 - 19:47:24 CDT
![]() |
![]() |