Re: http://www.hjrdba.com/

In article <3CD2E4F6.8EC8F659_at_BACKSIESearthlink.net>, you said (and I quote):
> Sorry for the double-post, but just wanted to add one more thought that
> occurred to me. This whole discussion is likely very unfair to Howard.

Another good point. I don't think he's been "gagged", as his reply shows.

> My guess is that he can't comment publicly on the matter (else I'm sure
> he would have by now), so we should probably just let the thread die and
> give both parties the benefit of the doubt. It's mostly speculation and
> conjecture, including my own comments.

Sorry, disagree. These things should be discussed and aired. If nothing else, Howard will get public confirmation his work was being appreciated (and that IS important!). And whoever in Oracle got cold feet with his site will get plenty of confirmation that sort of thing is frowned upon by the user community.

Nothing wrong with either.

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam