Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: separate data/inidex

Re: separate data/inidex

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:41:39 +0100
Message-ID: <1019461220.12836.1.nnrp-08.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

Comments in-line

--
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Author of:
Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases

Next Seminar - Australia - July/August
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html

Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html



Daniel A. Morgan wrote in message <3CC2CB08.64C747AF_at_exesolutions.com>...

>Please help me here with two things.
>
>1. "Nowadays to satisfy queries, you're full scanning tables, full scanning
indexes,
>not using indexes at all,...."
>
It is very easy to misunderstand the intent of a comment on the newsgroup, but I think if you re-read Connor's post carefully you will appreciate that he is not saying "you must full scan tables"; he is simply listing a number of the mechanism that are commonly (and necessarily) activated in a modern system.
>Since when? I work very hard to not do these things.
>
Don't work too hard at it. Sometimes the biggest performance problems are introduced by trying to push Oracle too hard into paths which use index range scans and index unique scans to access tables by rowid; resulting in excessive CPU usage and CBC latch contention.
Received on Mon Apr 22 2002 - 02:41:39 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US