Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: separate data/inidex
Comments in-line
-- Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Author of: Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases Next Seminar - Australia - July/August http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html Daniel A. Morgan wrote in message <3CC2CB08.64C747AF_at_exesolutions.com>...Received on Mon Apr 22 2002 - 02:41:39 CDT
>Please help me here with two things.
>
>1. "Nowadays to satisfy queries, you're full scanning tables, full scanning
indexes,
>not using indexes at all,...."
>
It is very easy to misunderstand the intent of a comment on the newsgroup, but I think if you re-read Connor's post carefully you will appreciate that he is not saying "you must full scan tables"; he is simply listing a number of the mechanism that are commonly (and necessarily) activated in a modern system.
>Since when? I work very hard to not do these things.
>
Don't work too hard at it. Sometimes the biggest performance problems are introduced by trying to push Oracle too hard into paths which use index range scans and index unique scans to access tables by rowid; resulting in excessive CPU usage and CBC latch contention.
![]() |
![]() |