Re: should we converting to sql server?

From: Alex Ivascu <Guest.2w40s_at_timelimit.pandora.be>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:40:11 GMT
Message-ID: <Guest.2w40s@timelimit.pandora.be>

By the way, I hope you're not using too many packages in your current database -- because, if you do, you can forget about them in SQL Server.

Alex Ivascu
DBA "Alex Ivascu" <alexdivascu_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message news:HNOs8.124962$QB1.30058762_at_typhoon3.we.ipsvc.net...
> The concepts are the same, but the way you do things (commands,
programming,
> etc.) -- are indeed different. It does help knowing another database
(i.e.
> Oracle).
>
> Alex Ivascu
> DBA
>
>
>
> "Joe Sath" <dbadba62_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:U4Ls8.7657$dU3.3039_at_nwrddc04.gnilink.net...[color=green]
> > My boss is asking me to evaluate the stability of sql server to see
> whether
> > it is stable enough so that we can convert to sql server to save
some
> money.
> > It is said that sql server 2000 is very compatible to oracle.
> >
> > What is your guys opinion?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
>
>[/color]

--
Alex Ivascu - Unregistered User
------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this thread: http://homer-w2k:7802/baanboard/showthread.php?threadid=6957

Received on Wed Apr 10 2002 - 05:40:11 CDT