Re: one big tables vs. many smaller

"koert54" <koert54_at_nospam.com> wrote in message news:Rh3r8.52068$DE4.6492_at_afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
> You might want to read up on clustered tables and see if this will work
for
> you ...
> This way you'll have logically multiple tables that are physically stored
in
> the same datablocks...

hm, hm...

is this faster than placing the tables on different disks to that they can read in parallel? Received on Fri Apr 05 2002 - 03:31:09 CST