Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: one big tables vs. many smaller
"damorgan" <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message
news:3CAC87E3.387D6428_at_exesolutions.com...
> Much like other things in life ... size has nothing to do with it ... it
is
> what you do with it that counts. The definition of a table should be based
on
> data normalization tempered by performance. If it belongs in one table ...
> stick it there. If not ... don't.
if there would only be one or to tables "Sub" then i would out int into the
big table
but there are up to 10 "Sub" tables - thus a big tables with many many null
values
Received on Fri Apr 05 2002 - 03:13:40 CST
![]() |
![]() |