Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Installing 9i fails on Win2k

Re: Installing 9i fails on Win2k

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 13:35:53 -0000
Message-ID: <3c989048$0$232$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


2 questions

  1. what network protocols do you have loaded? 2, Are you actually sat at the server when doing this or at a terminal services client? "Wyrm" <afdng_at_wyrm.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:1016625895.5949.0.nnrp-14.c29f1e83_at_news.demon.co.uk...
    > Hi.
    >
    > Further to my previous message, I've tried a nearly default installation
    of
    > Oracle 9i on my Windows 2000 machine (clean Windows 2000 SP2 install).
    > I chose Standard Edition rather than Enterprise.
    > Everything installed OK, but when the installer started running the
    > Configuration Tools there was a problem with Oracle Database Configuration
    > Assistant (again).
    > It copied the database files, initialized the database, but when creating
    > and starting the oracle instance it generated the following error:
    > ORA-01041 internal error. hostdef extension doesn't exist.
    > I tried Ignore, but it came back with:
    > ORA-24324 service handle not initialized
    > Ignore again gave me the first error, and ignore again the second error,
    > etc.
    > I had no choice but to abort.
    > After installation, I tried to look at the database created, but was
    unable
    > to login (illegal address).
    > I then ran the Database Configuration Assistant and tried to create a
    > database, but with the same problems.
    > I am getting this problem on two Win2k Sp2 servers. Is there anything I
    can
    > do to go forward from here instead of having to reinstall everything
    again?
    >
    > I am going to try what Howard recommended in the other thread and do a
    > Software Only installation on one of the two servers. However, this is not
    > encouraging for the robustness of 9i given that even the default
    > installation has problems!
    >
    > Laurence Mee.
    >
    >
Received on Wed Mar 20 2002 - 07:35:53 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US