Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is Sr. DBAs afraid of not be able to pass cert exam ??
Here is a list of questions we came up with to ask interviewees. They go
from easy to hard, mostly. Note that for some of the answers, we expected "I
don't know", which was an acceptable answer, so long as they could describe
where they would go to find the answer. Unacceptable answers to the tough
ones were guesses based on thin air. And yes, some OCPs (with little or no
experience) could NOT ANSWER question #1!!! I put the question in there as
an easy one to start with to make the interviewees feel comfortable (same
with #2). I was shocked when the first interviewee couldn't answer it (#1).
On #3, these OCPs would always answer with, "I would MONITOR...", whereas
experienced interviewees answered with "I would DO thus and such..." When
quizzed further about how they would actually go about SOLVING the problem,
the OCPs answered, "I would monitor..." again.
Note that the questions are heavily based on skills and knowledge acquired during experience, rather than from a book. BTW, can anyone here answer #20? (It actually happened to me, but we never expected a real answer, just an "I'm not sure, but I would..."). Yes, there may be one or more trick questions (with an answer like, "You can't do that")
Also, only experienced interviewees even came close on #13. Book OCPs had no idea at all. So, for your enjoyment...
"Keith Boulton" <kboulton_at_ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:zFX58.2140$zB.607331_at_news2-win.server.ntlworld.com...
> Tom Dyess <tdyess_at_dyessindustries.com> wrote in message
> news:pfW58.167682$_w.25696938_at_typhoon.tampabay.rr.com...
> > Keith,
> >
> > You didn't get much out of your first year of DBA work, did you? You
> > remind me of the poeple who claim to know 'everything' there is to know
> > about computers. I ususally run away when I hear that.
>
> I didn't claim that you would know everything after a year, but I do claim
> you should know everything you need to know. By the end of a year, you
will
> have encountered almost all the problematic situations that are likely to
> arise in that environment, you should have a good understanding of how the
> database works and you should be able to resolve new problems. This is why
I
> said "in a single job."
>
> This is different from the level of knowledge that might be preferred
> (although rarely found) in a troubleshooting consultant who might be
> expected to have both a broader and more detailed knowledge than is
required
> for most permanent DBA jobs.
>
> In my opinion, it is not knowledge that is important to be good at a job
in
> this industry, but rather the ability to adapt to new tools, software
> releases, development methods, hardware platforms and user requirements.
>
> To take an example, I've never used advanced queueing. I know advanced
> queuing exists and I've read the manuals about it. I'm confident (possibly
> incorrectly) that it would take me a very short time to get up to speed -
> I've used other message queueing software. The most important thing I've
> learnt from experience however is that you can never trust something to
work
> as expected. You have to devise usage and load scenarios and test them
> before committing to a production architecture - even if you've used the
> particular tool before it may have changed between releases or your
previous
> usage may have been been in a sufficiently different environment so as not
> to be comparable. If AQ didn't fit my particular needs, I'm quite happy to
> use another queueing mechanism or write my own. I believe this attitude to
> be more desirable than particular knowledge of AQ. I have often worked
with
> people who are knowledgeable but don't test their approaches before
> committing to a design. I've also often worked with people who force the
> requirement to fit their knowledge - ie if all you have is a hammer, every
> problem looks like a nail. What I'm saying is that attitude and aptitude
is
> mostly more important than detailed technical skill for recruitment to a
> permanent (or even long-term contract). Obviously for a 2 day consultation
> contract, the criteria must be different.
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wed Jan 30 2002 - 14:06:09 CST
![]() |
![]() |