Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
![]() |
![]() |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: temporary temp vs permanent temp
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 09:40:09 -0500, Mark D Powell wrote:
> "G.Ong" <onggs_at_acslink.aone.net.au> wrote in message
> news:<FPS28.6783$N31.292102_at_ozemail.com.au>...
>> Hi, >> >> Our system is 8.1.6.3 on Solaris 2.7. >> >> We used to used to have temporary segments on temporary tablespace (ie >> those created : create tablespace xxx temporary ). However, because of a >> number of unable to extend temporary segments, the system DBA recommend >> using temporary segments on permanent tablespace (because the sort >> segments are immediately released). >> >> Questions: >> 1) Is this a valid decision ? >> 2) If a hash join occurred involving a large table, does it use the same >> sort segment created for sorts ? (In this case, assuming a temporary >> temp is used.) >> >> TIA, >> Ghee
The problem is that blocks in the permanent tablespace are rpotected by while the logging mechanism does not protect temporary tablespaces. That means that using a permanent tablespace will strongly increase your IO . I believe that by distributing temporary tablespaces you can protect yourself from the ill effects of bugs. In my experience, temporary tablespaces are functioning properly. Received on Tue Jan 22 2002 - 07:58:30 CST
![]() |
![]() |